Beijing IP Court Hands Down Highest Damages Order in its 2-Year History in a Patent Case: 50 Million RMB
The Beijing IP Court on December 8 awarded damages of 50,000,000 RMB ($7.2M USD) in a patent case. This included 41 million RMB in legal fees. This is one of the first cases after the new burden-shifting rules for damages. Largely due to this change, damages were not limited to statutory damages. This is the beginning of a new phase in patent damages in China.
Importantly, the court also provided attorney fees calculated based on the necessity of hiring agents, difficulty of the case, and actual contribution of the lawyers. This was the first time the Beijing IP Court, established in November 2014, recognized the above three factors as the principles to judge attorney fees.
Chen Jinchuan, deputy director of the court, said they have been enhancing IP protection by greatly increasing compensation from rights violators, especially those committing bad faith and repetitive violations, so that the cost of IP infringement will no longer be low. "The market is the best frame of reference to determine the value of IPs," he said.
The technology in suit related to USBkeys distributed by banks to customers for security. See the Chinese government's release:
Welcome to the China Patent Blog by Erick Robinson. Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog discusses China's patent system and China's surprisingly effective procedures for enforcing patents. China is leading the world in growth in many areas. Patents are among them. So come along with Erick Robinson while he provides a map to the complicated and mysterious world of patents and patent litigation in China.
Erick Robinson is an experienced American trial lawyer and U.S. patent attorney based in Beijing. He is a Partner and Head of the Patent Practice at SIPS, a leading Hong Kong-based firm with offices in Beijing and Shanghai where he manages patent litigation, licensing, and prosecution throughout China.
The ideas and opinions at ChinaPatentBlog.com are my own as of the time of posting, have not been vetted with my firm or its clients, and do not necessarily represent the positions of the firm, its lawyers, or any of its clients. None of these posts is intended as legal advice and if you need a lawyer, you should hire one. Nothing in this blog creates an attorney-client relationship. If you make a comment on the post, the comment will become public and beyond your control to change or remove it.