Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog
Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Contact

Apple's Supply Chain and China:  Why the Tech Giant Will Likely Be a Frequent Defendant in Patent Litigation in China

6/25/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Anyone involved in the technology space should understand Apple's supply chain.  A friend of mine, Professor Seamus Grimes, has co-authored an excellent paper on the position of China in Apple's supply chain.  The reason why this is on my blog is that because China is so important to and intertwined with Apple's product ecosystem.  The paper shows how difficult it would be for Apple (and likely most tech companies that use China as a manufacturing base) to extricate itself from the Middle Kingdom.  

Given that they Apple be staying in China for the long haul, Apple will have to change its relationship with China.  Apple has not been the best friend to China.  Sure, they use the country for manufacturing, which has led to hiring a lot of Chinese workers -- some by Apple directly and more by suppliers such as Foxconn.  But just because have directly and indirectly led to employment for tens of thousands of Chinese workers does not mean they are really helping China.  If Apple were to be on the losing end of a patent lawsuit in China and enjoined from selling mobile devices in the country and from exporting them from China (yes, Chinese patent injunctions affect exports in addition to imports) then lots of workers would be out of work.  For three weeks.  And then they would go across the street or even to another part of the same factory and do the same work, but for one of the many Chinese mobile champions such as Xiaomi, Huawei, Lenovo, and ZTE.  ​
And this would be a net positive for China because Chinese companies are easier to control and contribute more money to China.  Currently the vast majority of Apple's revenue stream runs through Ireland in order to avoid taxes.  This means that a very small amount of Apple's income flows to China.  Chinese competitors, however, do not have the option to avoid Chinese taxes.  So at the end of the day, China benefits from Apple losing market share to domestic competitors.  

The reason that Apple recently invested $1 Billion in Chinese ride-hailing  app company Didi Chuxing was not because it loves taxis, but rather because it needs to curry favor with the Chinese government.  But this investment is just a drop in the bucket, and will be replenished in the coming months and years.  The reason that Apple needs to have a good relationship with China is not just because they use China to produce their products, but also because at least 25% of Apple's revenue comes from China:
>
All of this is to say that Apple cannot leave China, but is not China's favorite son (see, e.g., how Apple's iTunes movies and iBooks were blocked in China).  This -- and Apple's huge profits -- leaves the company open for patent lawsuits by both Chinese and foreign companies, including licensing companies.  Stay tuned over the next year or so to see how this evolves.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Follow @RobinsonErick

    Subscribe to the China Patent Blog by Email
    Welcome to the China Patent Blog by Erick Robinson.  Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog discusses China's patent system and China's surprisingly effective procedures for enforcing patents.  China is leading the world in growth in many areas.  Patents are among them.  So come along with Erick Robinson while he provides a map to the complicated and mysterious world of patents and patent litigation in China.  

    Author

    Erick Robinson is an experienced American trial lawyer and U.S. patent attorney formerly based in Beijing and now based in Texas. He is a Patent Litigation Partner and Co-Chair of the Intellectual Property Practice at Spencer Fane LLP, where he manages patent litigation, licensing, and prosecution in China and the US.

    Picture
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    5-year Plan
    Amendments
    Articles
    China
    China Patent Law
    China Supreme People's Court
    Chinese Antitrust Law
    Chinese Patents
    CNIPA
    Damages
    Foreign Patentees
    Government
    Huawei
    Intel
    Interdigital
    Other Blogs
    Qualcomm
    Royalties
    Semiconductor
    SEPs
    SIPO

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015



    ​Disclaimer:

    The ideas and opinions at ChinaPatentBlog.com are my own as of the time of posting, have not been vetted with my firm or its clients, and do not necessarily represent the positions of the firm, its lawyers, or any of its clients. None of these posts is intended as legal advice and if you need a lawyer, you should hire one. Nothing in this blog creates an attorney-client relationship. If you make a comment on the post, the comment will become public and beyond your control to change or remove it.

    RSS Feed