Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog
Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Contact

Chinese phones go global after pushing aside Apple, Samsung -- and why Chinese patents are essential to Chinese companies' success

2/28/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
Many are noting that Chinese handset makers are achieving great success in China.  For instance, see here where the following assertion is made:
​

"Along with other Chinese phone makers such as Huawei and Xiaomi, Chinese brands have surpassed Samsung in China and are encroaching on Apple’s turf. In the coming years, analysts forecast that these cheap Android phones with not-so-cheap features will likely attract more budget-conscious customers in Europe and even in Samsung’s and Apple’s home markets, South Korea and the United States."
​

​Chinese handset makers have indeed been gaining ground for years, but to take the next step, they will need to leverage patents.  Not patents in the US or Europe, but patents in China.  This will be a necessary step before great success in foreign markets forecasted by the referenced article can be achieved.  

Why are Chinese patents needed?  Because Apple and Samsung have their US and European patents aimed directly at the Chinese companies for when they are considered a threat.  So if the Chinese handset makers encroach on Apple and Samsung's Western markets, it makes sense that they would hit the Chinese companies with all they have in that jurisdiction.  Catching up to these behemoths in numbers of patents in the US or Europe is nearly impossible.  But the Chinese companies have a secret weapon:  China.

​As I pointed out here, China has developed in a short time what I believe is the best patent litigation venue in the world for creating market leverage. That is because in less than a year, a party can get an injunction not just on infringing sales in China, but also any products manufactured and exported from China.  So the Chinese companies could effectively get a world-wide injunction in less than a year while Samsung and Apple are only beginning the US and European processes. Germany is fast, too, but only protects the German market.  A great market, to be sure, but not the proverbial gun to the head that is the Chinese sales and manufacturing market.  And I do not imagine that these Chinese companies would have a problem winning in China.

Basically, to be allowed to compete fairly in the business markets in other countries, Chinese companies need to be able to enforce their patents in China. That is, to keep the lawyers at bay, they need to preemptively hire lawyers so that everyone has an interest in avoiding mutual assured destruction.  

It is a brave, new world.  And that world is more and more revolving around China. 






1 Comment
Shantanu link
2/4/2017 03:10:46 am

The best part about them is that they provide phones with the same or even better specifications than Apple or Samsung at much cheaper prices. I would especially like to mention about Xiaomi. They provide really pocket friendly phones.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Follow @RobinsonErick

    Subscribe to the China Patent Blog by Email
    Welcome to the China Patent Blog by Erick Robinson.  Erick Robinson's China Patent Blog discusses China's patent system and China's surprisingly effective procedures for enforcing patents.  China is leading the world in growth in many areas.  Patents are among them.  So come along with Erick Robinson while he provides a map to the complicated and mysterious world of patents and patent litigation in China.  

    Author

    Erick Robinson is an experienced American trial lawyer and U.S. patent attorney formerly based in Beijing and now based in Texas. He is a Patent Litigation Partner and Co-Chair of the Intellectual Property Practice at Spencer Fane LLP, where he manages patent litigation, licensing, and prosecution in China and the US.

    Picture
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    5-year Plan
    Amendments
    Articles
    China
    China Patent Law
    China Supreme People's Court
    Chinese Antitrust Law
    Chinese Patents
    CNIPA
    Damages
    Foreign Patentees
    Government
    Huawei
    Intel
    Interdigital
    Other Blogs
    Qualcomm
    Royalties
    Semiconductor
    SEPs
    SIPO

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015



    ​Disclaimer:

    The ideas and opinions at ChinaPatentBlog.com are my own as of the time of posting, have not been vetted with my firm or its clients, and do not necessarily represent the positions of the firm, its lawyers, or any of its clients. None of these posts is intended as legal advice and if you need a lawyer, you should hire one. Nothing in this blog creates an attorney-client relationship. If you make a comment on the post, the comment will become public and beyond your control to change or remove it.

    RSS Feed